Computations on the Manin Conjectures for K3 surfaces, by Ronald van Luijk
All graphs below represent the number of points on some smooth quartic in P^3
of bounded height B, versus the logarithm of the B. They are supposed to
support a hopefully-one-day-to-be conjecture.
I started with in the first series
and the second series
and the third series
of examples. See those pages for more explanation of what is happening here.
For this series I followed a suggestion of Noam Elkies to find more surfaces with small coefficients
and Picard number 1 in a very cheap way. The way I obtained a K3 surface with Picard number 1 in the
first place was by constructing a surface that was right modulo both 2 and 3. By applying an automorphism
to the surfaces in the reduction before taking a lift using the Chinese remainder theorem, we obtain
many more surfaces with Picard number 1 as well. The nice thing about these, as opposed to just picking
different lifts of the very same surface modulo 6, is that the surfaces are all given by equations
with small coefficients. This makes it more likely that the contribution to the real part of the
coefficient in the conjectured asyptotics is not very small.
For "fair" statistics I applied only an automorphism to the surface modulo 3. I applied all 3^6
upper triangular matrices with F_3-entries and ones on the diagonal. Of these 3^6, there were
87 where the real contribution exceeded 7. For each of these I computed the genus of the
hyperplane sections of the surface given by w=0 and z=0. For each I also did the same for all
surfaces obtained by adding +-6M for some monomial. There were just over 500 where the genus
of both intersections was at least 2. Among these there were 35 for which the real contribution
exceeded 7. Those 35 are given here.
In a few cases the points on the curve given by x+2z=0 were left out. This is indicated
underneath the graph. The cases where I use a nontrivial correction factor or where I added
some other comment come first.

A correction factor 5/6.

Correction factor 3/4.

Correction factor 2/3.

Correction factor 4/5.

Correction factor 2/3.

Clearly I need to find some curve here (haven't tried much yet). Otherwise we're in trouble, unless there can be a positive correction factor. Same with the next case.
ha, or I just messed up the computations. I have not yet fixed the picture/graph, but at the latest check, the earlier computed local contributions no longer seem correct at all. Perhaps they belonged to a different surface. I redid them, and now found that the bad primes under 1000 are 233, 347. The product of (1-1/p) * #X(F_p) / p^2 over all p (good enough approximation for bad primes that big) at most 250 is now 1.49 and the real contribution is 7.37, giving a heuristic constant of 10.99. This seems fine.

A perfect line, but a correction factor 2 is needed. How can this be explained, or is there a curve here I haven't found yet (I haven't really looked yet)?
Or I messed up the calculations here as well. Not sure how this happened, but after redoing the local calculations, I get 1.28 (product over primes up to 250) instead of 0.62 (primes up to 1000) for the contributions of finite primes, which is pretty close to a factor of 2 off...
before I realized I computed some local contributions wrong, I said:
Ok, so for the two cases above: They are the only cases (outside the firstseries, where there really are not enough points to say anything anyway) with a positive correction factor, which could be exactly 2 in both cases. The other way out would be that there is some curve of genus 1, but I can not find one. There does not seem to be one that is a hyperplane section, as I tried the plane through many random choices of quadruples of points and the most number of points they contained was 10 for the top example (still genus 3 intersection) and 17 for the bottom example, all on the genus-2 curve given by x=0. There also does not seem to be a quadric that accounts for many (say a third) of the points, for if there had been, trying random 11-tuples would likely find it, and it didn't. Also, the potential factor is an integer, so it could be the order of a group, say the Brauer group of the surface(?). Note that the algebraic part of the Brauer group is trivial though...

A positive correction factor as well? Or just big oscillations?


























